Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Mosque Mayhem

Journalism ‘13

Published: Monday, August 30, 2010

Updated: Monday, August 30, 2010 04:08

One of the hottest debates in New York City lately is whether an Islamic community center and mosque should be built near Ground Zero. Needless to say, people were disgusted and angered by the plans when they first surfaced.

Ever since the attacks on 9/11, the fear of and resentment towards Muslims has grown more and more. Some Americans fear Muslims, automatically associating the otherwise peaceful religion with terrorism. Because of this, there is opposition from all sides towards the construction of this mosque. On one hand, many believe that the mosque spits in the face of all those who died or were affected by the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center. However, others, like Mayor Bloomberg and President Obama, fiercely defend and support the proposal because they believe it will promote freedom of religion and advocate tolerance.

Although the construction of the mosque might not have bad intentions, it is done without a shred of sensitivity. The World Trade Center once stood only a few blocks away, and thousands of people perished there because of Muslim extremists on September 11, 2001. The fact that it is so close to Ground Zero sparks anger and offense in many Americans, especially those affected by the 9/11 attacks.

It also misrepresents the Muslim population in America as a whole. This is not the right way to go about Muslim tolerance and to advocate religious freedoms and rights. The mosque is more of an upsetting presence to American sensibilities than it is a monument to religious tolerance.

The tragedy that happened on September 11 should be respected. However, the United States Constitution has no room for sensitivity on this issue. It clearly states that everyone has the freedom and right to practice their religion. Although Obama and Bloomberg might reflect on the sensitivity of the matter and remember those who have died because of attacks on September 11th, they see this as an opportunity to get past fear and hatred and to advocate tolerance and respect. This is not exclusive to those of Muslim faith.

Ultimately, the mosque should not be built in such close proximity to Ground Zero. Whether or not it has support from President Obama and Mayor Bloomberg, the plan should not move forward. It is apparent that many Americans do not want this mosque to be built.

Everyone is free to practice his or her religion; that is stated in the Constitution. However, it would be in everyone's best interest to have the Islamic center and mosque built further away from Ground Zero, or for it not to be built at all. With the ninth anniversary of the terrorist attacks of September 11th approaching, perhaps a proposed solution will arise that will put all sides at ease.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

8 comments

Anonymous
Fri Sep 10 2010 12:01
Just because she mentioned that most Americans (about 60%) don't want the mosque/community center to be built doesn't mean she's saying that they're right. Their voice has just as much right to be heard as any of you, and she's proposing that there should be a solution that eases the tensions on both sides. Or would you rather silence them? Don't disguise your extremism with moderation. Some of you are just as bad as the people that see the structure as a symbol of "terror". Have you ever asked yourself where the money's coming from to build this structure?
Anonymous
Thu Sep 2 2010 13:25
This proverb is appropriate to this situation:
"In the house of the hanged, do not speak of rope."
Nadine
Wed Sep 1 2010 22:46
I am really shocked at witnessing the debates about the “ground zero mosque” and I don’t mean just on ticker, but on every TV news channel, radio station and newspaper.
What upsets me is not that over 60% of the participants voted against it, but it is their reason why they are voting against it. To summarize the anti-mosque voting attitude, is that they don’t want a mosque near Ground Zero because the terrorist who attacked the twin towers were Muslim extremists and building it near that memorial ground would be hypocritical and not fitting.
But is that the real reason?
Opposition against Mosques isn’t just to be witnessed in NYC’s Ground Zero, but all over America.
What was the reason for the opposition in Murfreeboro, Tennesse, where hundreds of protesters came together with signs “Keep Tennessee Terror Free” and “Don’t Glorify Murders - No Victory Mosque”. And another Protests took place in June in Temecula, California and again another in July Sheboygan, Wisconsin and that is just to name a few. So what was their reason for protesting?
The answer to that would be discrimination and hate.
Since 9/11 America is putting ALL Muslims in one big pot. If asked to name one Muslim, who would you name? I guess not me because you don’t expect me to be one. I guess you also wouldn’t name Malcom X or Richard Thomson (one of the best guitar players) or Muhamed Ali or Mike Tyson, and neither would you name Rima Fakih (Miss USA 2010), we just don’t fit into your expectations of a Muslim. The one name you all would name would be Bin Laden.
Isn’t that a sad example of America “the land of the free”.
Anonymous
Wed Sep 1 2010 22:35
I think the first commenet should be published in the next issue of The Ticker in the opinions section. It brings up alot of valid points to get one thinking.
Anonymous
Wed Sep 1 2010 04:49
This author is free to give her opinion (First Amendment right) but she goes too far when she presumes to know what is in "everyone's best interest." It is not in the best interest of those of us who think it wrong to place upon all Muslims the burden of the actions of extreme terrorists who claimed to be acting in the name of Islam when the American Muslim community has rejected the terrorists' interpretation of Islam. As a Jew, I am particularly sensitive to the idea that some would place upon the whole Jewish community an extra burden because of the actions of a few Jews.

I would guess that it is the terrorists who would benefit most if the Islamic Center were forced to move somewhere else. The terrorists would claim that the American religious liberties do not include Muslims.

Mina
Wed Sep 1 2010 00:28
I have to agree with the previous post, the author's bias is apparent in the article as she continuously contradicts herself. For one thing, she encourages Americans to refrain from making generalization about the "Muslim population in America as a whole" (Muslim-Americans for short). However, her previous paragraph states the community center should not be built due to the actions of a handful foreign Muslim extremists, who in no shape or form represent the majority of American Muslims.

Secondly, she claims that "many Americans do not want this mosque to be built" without providing any statistical evidence. I work in the downtown area and have passed by Park 51 mosque numerous times. On every occasion, I have witnessed both Muslims and NON-Muslim Americans calling for religious freedom. It surprises me the media never really seems to document the support for the mosque. And even IF the whole nation were against the construction of the mosque, does that make it fair for one group to have their rights revoked just to please the general population? If that was the case, slavery would still be in existence today.

The main point is that we have rights in this country -- which is what makes America great and also unique --- the founding fathers wrote religious freedom into the first amendment -- that was no accident -- the had seen what state religions and majority religions had done to victimize minority religions and unpopular religions -- and they rejected that explicitly. They did it precisely because of issues like this mosque thing -- that is when the constitution and 'freedom of religion' really matter ---- The price of living in a country with a free press and free speech and free religion is that you have to hear and see things you don't agree with and just like your neighbors can't stop you from building your house of worship because they don't agree with you -- you can not stop them.

We don't have freedom of religion because we say, "we're America and every has freedom" that just an empty statement, unless we actually practice it.

It's a good thing the author is still a freshmen at Baruch and still has much to learn about proper reporting.

Anonymous
Tue Aug 31 2010 21:06
Hey anonymous, if you paid attention to detail you would notice that the article was in the opinion section, it wasn't written by Ticker.
Anonymous
Tue Aug 31 2010 19:22
How is it in everyones best interest of this Islamic Center/Mosque built further away or not built at all? Are we (Americans) really going to start telling people where to build places of worship? Are we (Americans) going to start regulating religion? Isn't that going against everything that we (Americans) stand for?

Do we ban the construction of Catholic Churches near play grounds? Do we discriminate against all Christians because of actions of a few Priests?

Do we ban stores that sell meat to operate near a Hindu Mandir?

How does the construction of this Mosque "spit" in people's faces? Have you visited the area around Ground Zero lately? Does the strip-club (http://daryllang.com/blog/4421) that operated 2 blocks away from Ground Zero spit in peoples faces?

90% of the people who oppose this Mosque associate ALL Muslims with terrorism, which we (Baruch students) know is not the truth. Do you think the guy selling Chicken and Rice on the corner is a terrorist plotting on America?

I am very surprised to see such an article in Baruch's newspaper. Baruch is such a diverse school with what I thought was very educated people. This type of bias article I would expect to see in the NY Post or Newsday, or in a paper for a town/city in the middle of America where people have never seen or interacted with a diverse community.







log out